Western Anti-Africa Agenda And The Strategy Of Managed Chaos

It was a strategy long used with devastating precision. It was a cancerous geopolitical tumor designed to destroy the body politic with the final catharsis of a violent death. It first saw its manifestation in the American south. The British had lost their prized colony of what is now the United States with the American declaration of independence in 1776 and the victory of the rebels in the American revolutionary war.

But the British would use the internal contradictions of the new state to create the conditions for the growth of the geopolitical tumor called the anti-USA. That tumor was the American South. The southern states that supported and maintained slavery. The British supported and nurtured close links with the southern states in the lead up to the American civil war due to the dependence of the British textile industry on King Cotton.

We note that the mechanization of textile production was a major driver of the industrial revolution and the rise of Britain to global power. They clearly understood that the internal contradictions of the US was a prime and favorable condition to weaken the new state. The southern confederacy was an anti-USA that they tacitly encouraged in order to weaken the United States.

Although the geopolitical project of the anti-US failed with the defeat of the confederacy, it gave birth to a new geopolitical tumor. Both the United States and Britain learned important geopolitical lessons from it. The important lesson was the creation of the tumor of an anti-Country to devastate the state organism from within.

The US and Britain now Siamese-twined political allies would set out to implement this policy around the world with devastating effect on major countries or potential major adversaries. We will take a panoramic tour through the geopolitical gallery of the portraits of the anti-country from the 20th century until now.

It is the year 1940, the battle of Britain is raging on. The British Empire is beginning its rapid decline into permanent trash. In India the crown jewel of the Anglo-Saxon empire of death is bursting at the seams. The Indians demand independence. The independence of India with its huge population and human potential could play a powerful role in challenging European dominance in South Asia.

What can the Anglo-Saxons do? They dusted out the anti-country tumor. They needed to create an anti-India. A dour Indian Muslim by the name of Ali Jinnah an anglophile who headed an organization called the Moslem League demanded in 1940 the creation of a separate Muslim state to be called Pakistan. In 1947 India gains independence and partition follows immediately with the creation of Pakistan. The Anglo-Saxon plan had worked, an anti-India Pakistan had been created which would keep India occupied and distracted by its antagonism both militarily and politically. This anti-India would engage India in several wars and actively try to prevent India from being the major power in South Asia.

The anti-country tumor marches on. Its next victim is infected in 1949. In 1949 Mao Zedong and his communist guerrillas are poised to take Beijing the Forbidden City and gain control of China. The geopolitical implications are clear. A communist takeover of the most populous and one of the most ancient civilizations in the world.

The Americans design the anti-country tumor. They evacuate Chiang Kai- Shek the defeated nationalist leader of China and his Kuomintang forces to the Chinese island province of Taiwan and establish the anti-China Taiwan with Chiang Kai-Shek as its leader. The anti-China Taiwan retains China’s seat at the UN until the 1970s. The US has a defense pact with Taiwan against China. Tensions are almost always high. The anti-China Taiwan is a tumor in the form of an unsinkable island aircraft carrier against China.

The next stop of the anti-country tumor is Russia. Russia sits at the heart of Eurasia. She is the most powerful military power in Eurasia. To keep her distracted and weakened, an anti-Russia has to be created. The anti-Russia project is inserted in the Russian Soviet organism in 1991 with the independence of the Ukraine after the collapse of the Soviet Union. In fact sources say that right after the secret agreement in 1991 in a forest in Belarus which recognized an independent Ukrainian state, then Russian president Boris Yeltsin immediately phoned Bush to report to his masters that the Soviet Union had been dissolved.

Today we see in the Ukrainian crisis resulting from a coup fomented by the US state department a rabidly Russophobic Ukrainian state. It has been used as an anti-Russia to keep Russia occupied and distracted.

We now come to Africa. This is the last portrait of the geopolitical gallery we are touring. The anti-country virus arrives on our storied continent. It must first be applied on a micro level. The choice of the guinea pig falls on Nigeria. The anti-Nigeria will be Boko Haram and its relentless drive to establish a fundamentalist state in the Northern part of Nigeria to terrorize and keep Nigeria distracted and weak.

Today Boko Haram controls about 20 percent of the territory of Nigeria amidst a recent devastating attack on Baga which killed thousands of people. The logical questions to be asked are? Why an anti-Nigeria tumor? Who is creating the anti-Nigeria? We will attempt to answer these questions.

In April 2014, Black Africa’s Nigeria overtakes white economically dominated South Africa as the biggest economy in Africa. The geopolitical implications are huge.

In 1890, the US economy overtakes that of Britain to become the biggest economy in the world. The consciousness begins to dawn on the American elite about their newly acquired power. America with that consciousness of power would go on to become one of the most dominant and at certain periods the most dominant global power in the world.

With Nigeria’s newly acquired economic status, the consciousness of power will come to the Nigerian elite, a logical deduction from the axioms of historical process, and with that, Nigeria would become a dominant economic, military and technological power in Africa around which Africa would orbit.

The engineers of geopolitical tumors go to work. The method is always the same. Use the internal contradictions inherent in the state organism to create the tumor, the anti-Nigeria. The intensity of Boko Haram’s attacks and its sophisticated handling of advanced weaponry begins to increase with impressive speed following Nigeria’s rise to economic leadership in Africa. From the time that Nigeria became the largest economy in Africa to the first month of the year January 2015, Boko Haram has grown to now control 20 percent of Nigeria’s territory and outguns the Nigerian army sowing chaos and instability in Nigeria.

Today, nobody talks about Nigeria as the biggest economy in Africa. She is now preoccupied with fighting the anti-Nigeria Boko Haram.

Where does Boko Haram a rag-tag group of fundamentalists led by a certified idiot get the funds to buy very sophisticated military equipment that many big countries cannot even afford and the training to use them?

Many African countries cannot afford to even buy basic supplies for their armies. There are no oil fields in Northern Nigeria for Boko Haram to seize and sell. The logical and obvious answer calls for the search of a pattern of geopolitical behavior in world affairs. The efforts to destabilize Nigeria in a process of managed chaos through the creation and funding of an anti-Nigeria is led by those that created the tumor in their geopolitical lab and have created anti-countries in the past. We all know who they are.

This is just the beginning. As Africa rises, the efforts will increase for those who we know, who know that we are waking up to their evil to destabilize Africa in the form of an anti-Africa. Who could be used as a possible anti-Africa acting as a geopolitical tumor in the African organism?

On January 12, 2015, three vassals from Francophone Africa were summoned to the imperial city of Paris by their imperial overlord France to take part in a comic march called the Charlie Hebdo march. One of them was seen crying for the French victims. The geopolitical doctors of the west were watching intently.