What’s wrong with these headlines? Well, for one, they contradict each other.
Both refer to China’s new leader Xi Jinping. The headline from China Daily reads: “Fast growth to continue, Xi says.” The headline from The U.S. based Wall Street Journal reads: “China’s Xi Says Fast Growth Over.”
Unless Xi Jinping can’t remember what he just said, one of these news publications is grossly exaggerating. But which one?
Who’s side are you on?
The Atlantic’s James Fallow titled his post regarding this discrepancy: “Why You Should Get More Than One Newspaper.”
And perhaps his is right. Unless you enjoy your daily news with a side of reporter’s two cents.
Is either headline real…or is “real” a matter of opinion? Are journalists, bloggers, and reporters supposed to tell “the truth”–should we rely on them to do so like a doctor taking the Hippocratic Oath to practice ethically and honestly–or are they only bound to telling their version of the truth?
Is there a difference between their truths and the truth or are some “purported truths” just plain false?
A cursory glance at the BBC Africa page shows the kinds of “truths” the organization puts forth about Africa.
There is no shortage of headlines about violence…
Egypt army ‘linked to 2011 killings’
Ambushed Nigeria Police Bodies Found
Children ‘abused in conflict zones’
Indian UN troops killed in Sudan
Kidnapped Libyan PM’s aide freed
Women raped in Somali camps
Liberia: Sexual violence ‘endemic’
The people are savage…
‘Treated like dogs’: Africans complain of discrimination in India
The animals are human…
Ethiopian primate gives speech clues
And the West is kind…
US approves military aid to Somalia
If this news was representative of the occurrences in Africa, it would seem as if violence is a constant force in everyday life, which I am sure many Africans can attest that is not the case.
But how many thousands, even millions, of Africans turn to BBC for their daily dose of “news” each day?
People often feel cheated when they learn that the news isn’t really about news, but about conjecture and propaganda and ratings. That reporters aren’t objective, unbiased individuals, but porous minds socialized in subjective communities.
Maybe it’s time to reiterate that you should get more than one newspaper. More than two, even.
Perhaps in comparing more and more “truths,” we can arrive at a greater truth.
But it’s equally possible that seeking some semblance of truth–whether in China or in the U.S.–in any news at all, may in itself be an act in futility.