The Myth of Protection: How Control Masquerades as Care.
There are people obsessed with the population control of other nations. Why? Because if other nations stop having children, if their populations decrease, there will be more for the obsessed to control. That is the simple, painful truth.
Your having children. Your minding your business. Your growing your population. This, right here, is a problem for those whose eyes glitter green at the sight of your land, your resources, your life. And yet, you do not see it.
For too long, nations have buried their heads under bushes and coconut trees. They have forgotten the first, and perhaps only, law of nature: everything is out to kill you.
Look around. The mosquitoes bite. The ants bite. The spiders bite. The viruses linger in the air, waiting for an unsuspecting host. If you do not eat well, sleep well, or drink enough water, what else should your fate be but easier access for all those things nibbling at your body’s defenses?
That is the law of Mother Earth. But when people refuse to believe that other people, too, are trying to bite you, and kill you, what shall we call it? Ignorance? Naivety? Or just plain stupidity?
Meanwhile, our governments—oh, our governments—sign countless agreements. They strangle their own economies. They inject their own daughters with toxins, as if all these things were not designed to kill them softly. They pass laws. They sing hymns of “public health” as if it were the gospel of salvation.
Such is the case of women’s health.
They bring it to you, wrapped in sweet words, and hope you nod without question. “Women’s health,” they call it. “Empowerment.” “Education.” Noble words, yes. But look closer—always look closer. Women’s health, as they define it, is merely another name for population control.
They impose upon you the plight of “teenage pregnancy”—but what they mean is that women should not have children. They bring “vaccines for women and girls”—but what they mean is that women should be injected with toxins so they cannot have children. They bring “the right to education”—but what they truly desire is for women to stay away from home for as long as possible, so they may delay family and motherhood.
And even when a girl is pregnant, they insist she must return to school, because, they say, she has “a right to education.” But what right is it, truly, if it robs her of the right to nurture life? What liberation is it, if it chains her to a vision of womanhood defined by distance from her own nature? They dress their schemes in fine words—health, education, empowerment—but the pattern beneath is the same: a war on the womb, waged with the language of progress.
You might think there is nothing wrong with their bright and shiny policies. But ask: where does this all lead? It leads to the disruption of the family. The longer the obsessed can push your women to delay or abandon childbirth, the faster your population shrinks, and the easier your control becomes. So before you nod your head at something that sounds good, ask: Will this shrink our population? Will this destroy our future?
For all your leaders sleeping under coconut trees, they would be better served if the coconuts plopped down onto their heads. Maybe then they would wake up and realize that there is might in large numbers—that population is power. The ability of men and women to build with pride is their greatest resource.
Your leaders should know this: never discourage women from having children. Those children are the country’s future—its teachers, doctors, soldiers, entrepreneurs, engineers, and leaders. Your people, strong in number, are the only future you have.
