Cress Welsing’s theory mya have found popularity among some white women.

It seems to me that some women of European descent are coming to the realization quite frankly that Cress Welsing, author of the Isis Papers, was actually correct in her musings about the deeper psychological origins of white supremacism within native European cultures.

Welsing’s theory asserts that Anti-Blackness in native European cultures is rooted in nothing else but a disturbing feeling of insecurity with the Black Phallus. Simply put, European societies that nourish and maintain Anti-Blackness with all its violent and primitive manifestations in the enslavement and colonization of Black people, harbor the inferiority complex with their tiny phalluses in stark comparison to the Black Phallus.

In light of George Floyd’s murder, at the hands of the White Peace Officers of America, even some of the women of European descent are carefully trying to understand what it is that animates Anti-Blackness in their native European cultures.

Perhaps, and this placard is testament of that trend, Cress Welsing (March 18, 1935 – January 2, 2016), the African American philosopher and psychiatrist, and author of the1970 essay, The Cress Theory of Color-Confrontation and Racism (White Supremacy), was correct after all.

How apt! How revealing.

Previous articleWe Are All Just Animals. Really? – A Short Story
Next articleThe Cancer of MLK’s Passivity in Black Freedom Expression.
Amenuti Narmer
"Success without usefulness is a dangerous mentor. It seduces the ignorant into believing he cannot lose, and it misleads the intellectual into thinking he must always win. Success corrupts; only usefulness exalts." — WP. Narmer Amenuti (whose name translates to Dances With Lions) was born by the river, deep within the heartlands of Ghana, in Ntoaboma. A public intellectual from the Sankoré School of Critical Theory, he was trained and awarded the highest honor of Warrior Philosopher at the Temple of Narmer. As a cultural critic and a Guan rhythmmaker, Amenuti is a dilettante, a dissident, and a gadfly. He eschews promotional intellectualism and maintains strict anonymity, inviting both scholars and laypeople into open and honest debate. He reads every comment. If you enjoyed this essay and wish to support more work like it, pour libation to the Ancestors in support of the next piece—or go bold, very bold, and invoke them. Here's my CashApp: $TheRealNarmer

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.