You’ve Been Invaded. Europe & European-America Foreign Policy: All Predatory, Nothing Friendly.

You’ve Been Invaded. Europe & European-America Foreign Policy: All Predatory, Nothing Friendly.

A retired European-American intelligence analyst recently described the United States of America as a land conquered by Europeans. The Americas were not conquered by Europeans. Far from it. The correct history here is that the United States of America is a nation built upon Two Still Burning Ashes: (1) The genocide of Native Americans who gave early European explorers a home, but who turned around and wiped out over 100 million Natives through a clandestine biological war-craft, and (2) The summary human trafficking, chattel enslavement, and slow industrial genocide of West Africans for over four centuries, from which the extracted wealth used to build up the United States of America made it even more conducive for more Europeans to be shipped to it.

This is the sum of Europe’s foreign policy everywhere Europeans have gone—(1) kill, kill, kill (or the KKK), (2) take the land, (2) bring in non-European slaves to build it, (3) extract the wealth and (4) invite even more Europeans to it and cement the barbarism. There’s nothing more to it, and nothing less.

It is important that other civilizations understand the nature of this European outlook on the rest of the world. More specifically, it is important for the West African student of foreign policy and geopolitics to understand this European attitude towards the world, towards Africa, and towards Black People more precisely.

The first point is crucial—Europeans only want to kill, kill, kill. Two ways Europeans accomplish this: (1) If they have the military resources to quickly dismiss your defense, they will. (2) If they can’t defeat you in a linear manner, they will employ non-linear war-craft. This can be biological as in the use of European pathogens to wipe out Native Americans without a declaration of war, or they may employ the services of another military (like Anlo against Asante, Oyo against Dahomey, or Ukraine against Russia), or they may hire and train a mercenary armed forces to do the job.

If this does not work, they will (simultaneously or still further) employ agencies inside your land and attempt to weaken your traditional institutions (particularly your military institutions) from within until at which point they can deploy either linear warfare or non-linear war-craft against your lands.

One subsisting European war-craft remains even more pernicious: The Appeal To A Common Humanity (ATACH, for short). This can take the form of a Christian Mission to “save the savages,” or some Non-Governmental Agency (NGO) Mission to provide assistance to children, women, and cripples—like school feeding programs. You will notice that this appeal to a common humanity never takes the form of providing assistance to a group of capable men who can fight and resist European occupation.

Through this war-craft Europeans are able to ATACH themselves to a people they intend to ultimately kill, kill, kill, by buying and building confidence in a common humanity. This way the target land becomes unaware that the European policy is ultimately to kill, kill and kill, and then take the land (KKK & TTL). Notice that wherever they have been allowed to settle, they have refused to mix for the indigenous populations. The European foreign mission to KKK & TTL is hard to miss.

The African student of foreign policy and geopolitics may ask—How can we fortify our lands from a European (cunning) invasion in order to ultimately avoid being wiped off the face of the planet by barbarians? The answer is simple and straightforward. We take a page out of the book of those who have been successful at fortifying themselves from European (military) invasion, and thus have been able to preserve their lands from European balkanization and exploitation by European multinationals.

First, we must understand the way things have worked so far in West Africa: The power structures (public and private) in Washington, Paris and London decide what they want us to do within the Mis-Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), and we receive the information, and we start moving. They communicate their wishes through our seat of government in Lagos, or Accra, or Dakar (official channels) or through well-funded NGOs and Think Tanks (unofficial channels), and we move.

Or they do both. Or yet, they send their wire-tappers to the headquarters of The Bush’s brainchild, USAFRICOM, Obama’s favorite Ghettoblaster House, from where they come to boogy-away their nights in Africa. And our leaders shake, get up and start to do their bidding.

The way things are supposed to work in Africa at large is that whatever they come up with in Washington, they expect our automatic cooperation here in Africa. If our robotic cooperation is not immediately forthcoming, they apply political, financial and economic pressure from Accra, Lagos or Dakar, through the Diplomatic Corps and chief executives.

For the African student of foreign policy and geopolitics—How can we fortify our lands from this European (cunning) invasion?

Second, we must appreciate that the European men in Washington have hundreds of years of useful experience in this type of warfare against African nations and the militaries in African nations. From the slave raids off the West African coast to the genocide committed against Native Americans and others in the name of trade, Washington’s men, Paris’ women and London’s cowards and prostitutes, are skilled in the terrorism of the under-militarily-prepared nations in Africa.

This is how things worked during colonial terrorist occupation in Africa, this is how it worked after independence and this is how it works now and how it is supposed to work into the future—continuing the three hundred years of unchallenged terrorism emanating from the corridors of western European power. But alas, a new dynamic must emerge: the power of “Daabi!” The power of “No!” The power of “Nyet” by the Russians. The power of “A’a!”

The power of “Daabi” or “A’a” can be observed among the Russians, but the phenomenon can spread to Ghana and engulf the rest of Africa.

The situation will instantly change and it will look something like this: The Evangelical State of Anglo-America (TESA) decides what it wants from Ntoaboma, for instance—it could be gold, diamonds, or oil that they desire to steal. TESA communicates its exploitative wishes through the President of Ghana or Nigeria, expecting automatic cooperation.

Ghana says “Daabi.” The people in Nigeria say “A’a!” Because cooperation is not immediately forthcoming, they apply political, financial and economic pressure. Ghana and Nigeria again say “Daabi” and the people in Niger insist on the “A’a!” TESA then runs through all of the above steps up to but not including the bombing campaign it wishes to unleash through ECOWAS (or is it USAFRICOM?), from which it is deterred by Niger’s nuclear deterrent (which must become existent!).

The answer remains “A’a.” One could perhaps imagine now that some smart person within the TESA power structure would pipe up and say: “Based on the evidence before us, dictating our terms to Ntoaboma, through Ghana or through ECOWAS doesn’t work; let’s try negotiating with Ntoaboma and ECOWAS in good faith as equals.” And then everybody else would slap their cheeks with their palms and say, “Wow! That’s brilliant! Why didn’t we think of that?”

But wait for it: that smart person would probably be fired that very day because, you see, TESA or Euro-American global hegemony is nonnegotiable. And so what happens instead is that TESA will act baffled, regroup and try again, making for quite an amusing spectacle.

But Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso, Guinea, Senegal, Nigeria, etc., remain resolute: “Daabi!” is “Daabi.” No means no! You see? This is the only way you can fortify our lands from a European (cunning) invasion in order to ultimately avoid being wiped off the face of the planet by the barbarians.