White Fragility.

“Fragile things are privy to breaking…  We witness intellectual, mental and sometimes even physical kicking and screaming. We witness someone snarling and clawing to hold together a *worldview* that maybe breaking.” (Inigo Laguda).

Which got me thinking. Now he got me to rethink a few key points in the philosophy of the science of whiteness:

Yt people are not fragile. They have in fact, they have adopted and still adopt violent methods to entrench whiteness.

However, “whiteness,” itself is a very unstable philosophical idea. Almost nothing in nature exists as a stable entity that is white. Whiteness as a concept is a characteristically unstable idea. No one can be white, and only some plant-flowers turn white sometimes. Even then these are ephemeral things!

Which makes the idea fragile. Although fragility does not necessary imply instability.

Perhaps, it’s that “whiteness” is so unstable that yt people need all the violence and all their barbarism to entrench it. Without that input of energy (snarling and crawling), the idea of whiteness is as empty as a cloudless sky, and they yt people have nothing to root their ego.

Also, White Fragility is nothing but just a concept employed by yts for their own protection. It is an act. Also a myth. But, it is not a real thing. That is, it is employed to make the violence of yt people look as though yt people are under threat from Black people. A false equivalence. In effect, it is stagecraft that yt society now employs to make themselves more palatable to the public.

White Guilt. White Tears. Whit Whines = White Fragility (the Act – the making it all about yts).

The correct name for yt people is the Reds. KMTians called them Reds, the Moors referred to them as the Reds, so why refer to the European as “white”?

Previous articleDo It like China? My Foot.
Next articleColonial Education is a Weapon of Destruction.
~ Success is a horrible teacher. It seduces the ignorant into thinking that he can’t lose. It seduces the intellectual into thinking that he must win. Success corrupts; Only usefulness exalts. ~ WP. Narmer Amenuti (which names translate: Dances With Lions), was born by The River, deep within the heartlands of Ghana, in Ntoaboma. He is a public intellectual from the Sankoré School of Critical Theory, where he trained and was awarded the highest degree of Warrior Philosopher at the Temple of Narmer. As a Culture Critic and a Guan Rhythmmaker, he is a dilettante, a dissident and a gadfly, and he eschews promotional intellectualism. He maintains strict anonymity and invites intellectuals and lay people alike to honest debate. He reads every comment. If you find his essays delightful, and you want to support the creation of more content like this, find Narmer's information below: CashApp: $Narmer3100

1 COMMENT

  1. Definitely all white culture is stagecraft to instill an unnatural order.

    This part says it all: “ Perhaps, it’s that “whiteness” is so unstable that yt people need all the violence and all their barbarism to entrench it. Without that input of energy (snarling and crawling), the idea of whiteness is as empty as a cloudless sky, and they yt people have nothing to root their ego.”

    It explains why all the racism/anti-Blackness/genocide, because without it yts would be nowhere.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.